Peer Review Process

This journal implements a double-blind peer review process, in which both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the evaluation. All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess relevance, originality, and adherence to the journal’s guidelines.

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript’s scientific quality, clarity, methodological rigor, and contribution to the discipline.

Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor may decide to:

• Accept the manuscript,

• Request minor or major revisions, or

• Reject the submission.

Authors are required to revise their manuscripts according to the reviewers’ comments within the specified timeframe. Revised manuscripts may be re-evaluated to ensure the required improvements have been made.

The journal is committed to maintaining a fair, objective, and timely review process to support high-quality scholarly publication.